There’s been several new lens announcements for micro 4/3 lately and I just wanted to share a few thoughts on them. Sadly, none of these announcements are very exciting, at least not directly. But here’s the recap:
- 3 new Sigma lenses (19mm, 30mm, & 60mm f/2.8s)
- 1 new Tamron lens, a 14-150mm
- a Olympus 75-300mm Mk II
- several other third-party MF lenses
I don’t have anything to say about that last item, the manual-focus lenses. Frankly I’m not sure who buys those – in my mind, if you’re getting a manual lens, then why not just buy some great (and cheap!) legacy glass and an adapter? But that’s not really the point I wanted to make here…
The Sigma and Tamron announcements aren’t earth shattering. Two of the three Sigma lenses are just redesigns, and none of the three are faster than f/2.8, which is only moderately fast for a prime. The Tamron is a 14-150mm zoom, with the usual slower aperture range. Nothing too special there, since both Olympus and Panasonic already have a few of those.
But what is exciting is that both of these well-known third-party manufacturers are creating lenses for m4:3. Sigma is porting the lenses from the NEX system and Tamron only has the one lens at the moment, but it’s clear that both companies are recognizing the m4:3 system as one worth investing in. They are investing slowly, which is probably prudent from a corporate standpoint, but with any luck they will pick up the pace in the next year or so and continue to expand their line of offerings.
More offerings from more companies is a good thing; competition is good for us, as photographers, because it not only provides us with more options, but also helps drive prices down in the long run. The Sigma lenses are already really cheap (yet supposedly good performers), which will hopefully help moderate the prices of some of the Olympus and Lumix lenses.
Speaking of which, the Olympus 75-300mm Mk II is a good example of this. It’s a redesign of the original lens, although “redesign” might be a bit of a stretch since the optics are essentially the same and the differences appear to be mainly cosmetic. But the price is down – in the $500 range, as opposed to the insane price of the Mk I, which was almost $900.
I own the Mk I version, so this is all bad news for me from a value standpoint, as I will never be able to recoup my investment in this lens. I expect I’ll be lucky if I can sell it for $400 in the future (unless the Mk II turns out to be a real dog). And I always felt that the Mk I was grossly overpriced, given that it’s really just a slower version of a lens that every other camera system has at least one version of, all priced between about $300-$550. So I’m screwed, but the news is still good for m4:3.
There was another announcement a week or so back that five other companies had joined the m4:3 standard and would be producing lenses. None of them jumped out at me as names I really knew – a couple I don’t think I’d ever heard of. So again, not sure I’ll personally be buying anything from them – but it’s great that they exist as options. The more players who buy into this system, the better!
On a personal level, I’m making a couple of changes in my own bag as well. The Panasonic Leica 45mm macro lens is on eBay now. I never really took to the focal length as much as I had hoped. And I’m still lusting after the Lumix 35-100, which the 45mm’s sale will help finance. No sense having two lenses that cover 45mm at f/2.8. But I’m not giving up on macro, as I still have my Takumar 50mm f/4 macro. It’s all manual, but for macro shooting I don’t think that’s a problem. Plus it’s incredibly sharp, so I’m sure I’ll do fine with it.
I’m also tempted by the idea of the Lumix 12-35mm f/2.8 at some point in the future. It’s mostly a matter of convenience, having one fast zoom in the bag instead of a mix of primes for times when I want a very small but versatile kit with me. However, I suspect that Olympus will be coming out with a fast zoom in the near future, so I may hold off a while, just to see what their option is.
I guess my point is that m4:3 is well-established at this point. There are pros who have switched systems and are using the E-M5 or GH3 exclusively. Plus a whole range of semi-pros and ameature photogs. And I think there are good things on the horizon. Buying into a young system is always a gamble (will it last? will it grow?) and the options are limited at first. But given enough time and demand, it will grow. After all, I don’t think Canon launched with 200 lenses, either.